What Goes Around…Posters?!

The Inspiration Blog has a great post on this award-winning campaign for the website GlobalCoalitionforPeace from Big Ant International, a small design studio based in New York. I loved the use of traditional media in a very creative way, with very strong visuals complemented by an unforgettable tag line: What Goes Around/Comes Around. The second I saw this image, I was hooked with the brilliant design. Guerrilla marketing at its finest – something you just don’t expect.

However, reading the comments on the blog post showed that it was a sharply divisive campaign, one that incited great anger and admiration in equal parts. Lots of Iraq veterans thought that it was a disrespectful campaign and showed a lack of appreciation for the efforts of the US soldiers – others suggested that if it was meant to change foreign policy, it should be targeted at and show the makers of that foreign policy (such as the US Secretary of State) and not the instruments (the soldiers). This mushroomed into the whole debate whether the Iraq war was justified or not, whether the US should be criticized, what’s right with the world, US interventions (here I found this great webpage on the history of US interventions), and so so much more.

From a clearly marketing perspective, that’s not necessarily a bad thing – any publicity is good publicity – but valid criticisms of this campaign were that it was unclear what the message was and who it was targeting, especially for Americans.

Quite honestly, though, it was pretty straightforward for me – a criticism of US foreign policy – but that is probably because I have lived in an anti-American environment for all my life. First Saudi Arabia, where I had plenty of Arab friends who despised US interventionism, and now Pakistan, where the drones have become a symbol of hatred.

In any case, I think it’s a triumph for great design over anything else. The message is further reinforced by that great piece of copywriting – What Goes Around/Comes Around really reinforces the message that violence begets violence. Kudos, Big Ant!



  1. I agree with you! It is straightforward. As for the debate regarding targeting the makers rather than the instruments – well if the instruments weren’t used then such a problem may not exist!

    Seriously though, the design is really well done because it literally goes round! Makes it seem very simple!

  2. It IS good and straightforward. I think its targetting and showing the right people.

    Target Audience: The American Public whose opinion can change the foreign policy. Currently, they think the foreign intervention is making America safer. That’s how Bush sold the war to the American public in the first place. Although this is a great idea to start with, it should go on to open the Americans’ eyes to the repercussions of the war. How Pakistan is paying a far greater price for being an ally than they had bargained for.

    As for showing the instruments vs. the policy makers, in a way, it is the soldier who is suffering and not the latter. Bush has faced severe criticism for his policies, but its not him who will have to face the consequences.

    Good find!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s